, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you may Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and you may Jalalzai, 2021). Inside functions we’ll manage misogyny given that recognized by all of our interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s 6 age within the energy, particularly focusing on the relationship ranging from misogynistic backlash in addition to gendered twice bind dynamics understood. On the after the point you can expect a more nuanced meaning to have each one of the subcategories recognized (look for Desk 2), bringing stay-alone meanings and you can instances throughout the investigation with descriptive analyses off trick minutes during the Rousseff’s presidency one to exemplify the fresh new vibrant anywhere between all of our nuanced proposition to own checking out this new gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, and its particular issues towards the Rousseff’s presidency.
The latest four subcategories understood appeared in the content from the varying levels (look for Dining tables 3, 4). Several themes starred in higher proportion: Testing so you can Dudes and you may Misogynyments inspired due to the fact comparison so you can guys looked in the almost 50 % of all of the interview and illustrated 36 percent off all of the comments codifiedments inspired due to the fact misogyny was most comments (38 per cent) and you will starred in forty-two % of all the interview. This means that, interviewees was very aware away from Rousseff’s part as the chairman in comparison some other male political figures and you will previous presidents, as well as the ways Rousseff is penalized during the their unique management on account of gendered assumption and you will backlash.
While looking having less regularity regarding the interviews, the other a couple of themes provide crucial perspective so you can wisdom you’ll sexist backlash in presidency away from Brazil’s very first woman president. Talks about precisely how Rousseff tried to adhere to gendered standards ascribed in order to feminine (Conforming on the Double Join) starred in more ten percent of one’s comment coded and you can interviews presented. At the same time, discussion exactly how Rousseff challenged the new gendered expectations of their updates (Tricky the fresh new Twice Bind) starred in over you to definitely fifth of all interview, constituting 16 per cent of all comments coded.
Brand new malfunction of your numerical thickness of your thematic studies brings a kick off point to help you a good qualitative studies of each and Tjeckiska flickor fГ¶r Г¤ktenskap every motif, emphasizing the partnership anywhere between for every single motif, particularly the connection involving the three themes personally connected with the latest gendered double join (evaluation, complying, and you will tricky) together with misogynistic backlash you to definitely used.
Testing so you can men
One of the subcategories recognized are contrasting regarding Dilma Rousseff so you’re able to dudes, each other evaluating Rousseff so you’re able to men political figures and you may detailing how some thing was some other when the Rousseff was in fact men. Thus, we unearthed that there’s both a conceptual parts and you will simple component to their review to men. Inside a conceptual experience, we often watched the word, “if she had been one” to explain just how a situation will have starred out in another way had Dilma not already been a lady. The fresh new narrative illustrated within interviews is actually out-of a system that “favors dudes” (Respondent 88, ), with “no discover gender discrimination, nevertheless undeniable fact that [an effective politician] is one try a plus” (Respondent 8, ). When sharing it investigations even more concretely, there can be a watch Rousseff’s rough identification, the brand new “hard lady to tender guys.” Brand new price lower than brings a lot more perspective:
Discussions regarding the Rousseff’s impeachment additionally the sexism and misogyny behind the brand new procedure was indeed chatted about in the common mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you may Kaiser, 2016) and in scholarly work (Zdebskyi mais aussi al
Yes, and asserted that she is a difficult individual, you to definitely she cannot communicate with anybody, one she got an authoritarian way of talking. Exactly what for men appears as a praise “zero, he could be a challenging individual, a home-convinced individual that knows what the guy wishes.” So you can their are exhibited just like the negative “zero, she doesn’t learn how to talk, she is tough, the woman is so it” inside an awful means. How they communicate with you, feminine. I’ve attained a particular updates, we’re being severe, we’re deviating away from so you can how to become a lady, who is sweet, clear, hushed and you will eg. The form of Dilma getting is the sort of ladies who have the ability to getting strong contained in this a totally patriarchal business, facing that it order that can be acquired (Respondent 79, ).